Phone

+123-456-7890

Email

[email protected]

Opening Hours

Mon - Fri: 7AM - 7PM

Showing: 1 - 1 of 1 RESULTS
hqxekrnk

In search for unseen dark matter physicists turn to shadow realm

first_img Email In search for unseen dark matter, physicists turn to shadow realm Scientists hunting unseen dark matter are looking deeper into the shadows. With searches for a favored dark matter candidate—weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs)—coming up empty, physicists are now turning to the hypothetical “dark sector”: an entire shadow realm of hidden particles. The concept “has been percolating for 7 or 8 years, but it’s really coming to the fore now,” says Jonathan Feng, a theorist at the University of California, Irvine (UCI).This week, physicists will meet at the University of Maryland, College Park, for a workshop, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), to mull ideas for a possible $10 million dark matter experiment that could go ahead in the next few years. The effort would complement the agency’s current experiments, including the flagship WIMP search, LZ, a $76 million subterranean detector under construction in Lead, South Dakota. And many researchers believe DOE should focus on the dark sector. Jim Siegrist, DOE’s associate director for high-energy physics in Washington, D.C., says the goal is to fill in any gap in DOE’s searches for dark matter, which makes up 85% of the universe’s matter: “Is there anything we’re missing?”WIMPs, dreamed up in the 1980s, once seemed the perfect candidate for dark matter, which shapes the visible universe with its gravity. WIMPs would weigh a few hundred times as much as a proton and interact only through gravity and the weak nuclear force. A simple calculation suggests just enough of them should linger from the big bang to account for dark matter today—a selling point known as the “WIMP miracle.” In addition, WIMPs emerge naturally in many versions of supersymmetry, a concept that solves key technical problems in the standard model of the known particles. However, physicists have yet to detect WIMPs bumping into atomic nuclei in underground detectors. And the world’s most powerful atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Switzerland, has seen no sign of supersymmetry or WIMPs. Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility in Newport News, Virginia, supports just such fixed target experiments. In 2010, physicists on the A Prime Experiment at CEBAF searched—without success—for dark photons decaying into telltale electron-positron pairs. Last year, physicists on the Heavy Photon Search used CEBAF to try again. In future accelerator experiments, physicists might simply track the scattered electrons instead, looking for a distinctive kink in an electron’s trajectory that would result when it emits a dark photon.Or, as with WIMP detectors, physicists could try to detect dark-sector particles drifting in Earth’s vicinity. Because WIMPs are heavy, physicists search for them by looking for the recoil of heavy atomic nuclei such as those in liquid xenon. That technique won’t work for much lighter dark-sector particles, which would bounce off a heavy nucleus like ping pong balls off a bowling ball.Instead, physicists could look for the recoil of wispy electrons, perhaps in a device akin to an existing WIMP detector, says Kathryn Zurek, a theorist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California. Or they could create a frigid bath of light nuclei in “superfluid” helium, and look for tiny quantum vibrations triggered by the collisions. Another option would be to look for the breaking of free-flowing pairs of electrons in a superconducting metal. In part because light dark matter particles would be more numerous than WIMPs, a detector for them could be much smaller and cheaper than a WIMP detector, Zurek says. LZ will contain 7 metric tons of liquid xenon, whereas a detector for light dark matter particles could weigh a kilogram, she estimates.After the workshop, physicists will lay out their ideas in a white paper that DOE will consider over the coming months—although Siegrist cautions the $10 million isn’t guaranteed. Some hope the agency will quickly mount a “shovel ready” experiment, in particular an accelerator-based effort that looks for the dark photon by the kinked-trajectory method. “For $10 million you could build a really nice detector and set it down next to an existing accelerator,” says Timothy Tait, a UCI theorist. Others would prefer to develop techniques to directly detect light dark matter, even if it takes longer to mount an experiment. “I really hope this R&D can be part of the program,” Zurek says.JoAnne Hewett, a theorist at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory in Menlo Park, California, says she hopes DOE will seize the opportunity to launch not just a single experiment, but a more comprehensive 10- to 15-year program to probe the dark sector. Such experiments “cover a very important range and they’re cheap,” she says. “It really makes them must-do experiments.” By Adrian ChoMar. 23, 2017 , 9:00 AM JEFFERSON LABORATORY In the shadows Dark matter particles predicted by extensions of the standard model have not turned up, so a realm called the dark sector may be probed. Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe The no-shows have led physicists to turn to the dark sector. They speculate that dark matter might consist not of a single massive particle tacked onto the standard model, but of a slew of lighter particles and forces with tenuous connections to known particles (see illustration). For example, in the familiar universe, massless photons convey the electromagnetic force; in the dark sector, a massive dark photon would convey a dark version of electromagnetism. Theorists generally expect that ordinary and dark photons would subtly intertwine or “mix.” Very rarely, then, a particle interaction that would normally produce a high-energy photon would instead produce a dark photon.Higgs bosons and neutrinos would connect similarly to the dark sector. Thanks to these portals, the infant universe should have produced the right amount of dark matter, much as in the WIMP miracle.Dark sector particles would be much lighter than WIMPs—less than the mass of a proton—so physicists don’t need the energy of the LHC to blast them into existence. A much lower energy but intense electron beam could do the trick. When electrons crash into a solid target they radiate abundant photons—and could occasionally generate a dark photon. C.BICKEL/SCIENCE The electron beam at Jefferson Laboratory creates copious photons in the hopes that a few may be dark.last_img read more